I'd like to see
editorial cartoons
about ...



No need to add
editorial cartoons
to your keywords!

Advanced Search
Know the
image number?


Find editorial cartoons
for:

Books
Magazines
Newsletters
Presentations
Websites



Find Editorial Cartoons by: Cartoonist I
Advanced Search I Keyword(s)


Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons

Cartoons about bigotry .

These are available for you to license for books, magazines, newsletters, presentations and websites.
Roll-over each thumbnail and click on the image that appears to see links for licensing.
Questions? Please let us know.

View results from all properties Refine Search View Related Subjects

Result page:     (15 images)


1. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2001-09-18 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2017-10-02 Pub. Date: 2001-09-18
Image Number: 39496
Caption: It's time we send back foreign born, foreign speaking, non-American citizens. It's time we sent back foreign speaking, different looking, people who weren't born in America. It's time we send back funny sounding, different thinking, people who don't look like Americans. It's time back different sounding, blasphemous thinking, people who aren't real Americans. It's time we send back anyone who doesn't sound like me.
     
2. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2017-08-14 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2017-08-14 Pub. Date: 2017-08-14
Image Number: 161707
Caption: We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides. Election 2016.
     
3. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2006-02-23 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2017-06-29 Pub. Date: 2006-02-23
Image Number: 35748
Caption: Offensive speech. Hey - I'm all for the 1st amendment. Some of my best friends are bigots �
     
4. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2017-06-09 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2017-06-09 Pub. Date: 2017-06-09
Image Number: 159316
Caption: T. Coke. Sexism. Bigotry. Ketch up. Goose.
     
5. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2002-12-17 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2017-01-10 Pub. Date: 2002-12-17
Image Number: 21568
Caption: And now for some late-breaking old news - prominent positions in the US government are held by good ol' boy bigots�As well as Christian fundamentalists and misogynists.
     
6. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-12-28 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-12-28 Pub. Date: 2016-12-28
Image Number: 152800
Caption: Cards for Every Occasion. Thanks Donald! For making lying acceptable. Thanks Donald! For being the voice for Americans' bigotry. Thanks Donald! For making sexism ok again. 2. Thanks Donald! For threatening 1st amendment rights. Bill of Rights. Thanks Donald! For escalating international tensions.
     
7. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-08-16 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-08-16 Pub. Date: 2016-08-16
Image Number: 147589
Caption: The Trump Candidacy. How did we get here? The rise of the religious right and the "culture war". The silence of the moderate GOP. News. Entertainment news. Celebrity worship. You're either with us or against us. Politicians stoking Jingoism and faux patriotism. Pitting us versus them. Americans are angry. Wages. Healthcare. Standard of living. Reality tv. Knowledge ... and less educated. Trump. Unfortunately, regardless of the election results the Trump candidacy. Opens up the door to future dangerous and more politically savvy demagogues.
     
8. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-05-16 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-05-16 Pub. Date: 2016-05-16
Image Number: 143532
Caption: Make American Men Real Men Again. Make American Women Back in the Kitchen Again. Make Bigotry Acceptable Again. Make 1950s America Again. Make White Men in Charge Again. Make Ignorance Bliss Again.
     
9. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-03-09 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-03-09 Pub. Date: 2016-03-09
Image Number: 140458
Caption: If Trump was at the Dem debate … Get her out! (Live sketch suggested by March 9, 2016 Democratic debate.)
     
10. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-02-29 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-02-29 Pub. Date: 2016-02-29
Image Number: 140032
Caption: "I know nothing about David Duke. I know nothing about white supremacists." Dunce.
     
11. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2016-01-07 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2016-01-07 Pub. Date: 2016-01-07
Image Number: 137644
Caption: Les Cathos Integristes. Contre le theatre. Charlie Hebdo. 100 coups de fouet, si vous n'etes pas morts de rire! So now the shock of the murders has turned to questioning Charlie Hebdo's satire. Some cartoonists and writers have described the cartoons as anti-Muslim, blasphemous, offensive and bigoted. The 2009 firing of a cartoonist who wrote and anti-Semitic column has also been mentioned ... First of all, I am not a big fan of bathroom humor. Secondly, and more seriously, it's a valid discussion to have about why the divisions between people are so deep and our political discourse have become toxic ... However: That is not what we should be talking about now. The only question we should be asking is: Do we condone threats or violence toward individuals because of what they say or draw, regardless of how offensive the words or images are? NO. Because what happens once we get beyond the easy images to condemn? What?? And who makes that decision? All people must have the right to express themselves without fear otherwise we risk losing all our freedoms. (This cartoon was originally published on 2015-01-13).
     
12. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-11-18 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-11-18 Pub. Date: 2015-11-18
Image Number: 135494
Caption: Give me your tired, your poor, your Christian masses … Bible.
     
13. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-29 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-29 Pub. Date: 2015-06-29
Image Number: 129201
Caption: Censored. Cite as: 576 U.S. - (2015). Scalia, J., dissenting. Every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification and Massachusetts' permitting of same-sex marriage in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a "fundamental right" overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in time since. They see what lesser legal minds - minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Olive Wendall Holmes, Hr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly - could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when is called for by their "reasoned judgment." These Justices know that limiting marriage to one mand and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution. The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic. It is one thing for separate concurring or dissenting opinions to contain extravagances, even silly extravagances, of thought and expression; it is something else for the official opinion of the Court to do so. Of course the opinion's show profundities are often profoundly incoherent. "The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy and spirituality. (Really? Who ever thought that intimacy and spirituality [whatever that means] were freedoms? And if intimacy is, one would think Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expanded by marriage. Ask the nearest hippie. Expression, sure enough, is a freedom, but anyone in a long-lasting marriage will attest that that happy state constricts, rather than expands, what one can prudently say.) Rights, we are told, can "rise ... from a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives define a liberty that remains urgent in our own era. (Huh? How can a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives [whatever that means] define [whatever that means] an urgent liberty [never mine], give birth to a right?) and we are told that, "[i]n any particular case," either the Equal Protection of Due Process Clause "may be thought to capture the essence of [a] right in a more accurate and comprehensive way, than the other, "even as the two Clauses may converge in the identification and definition of the right. (What say? What possible "essence" does substantive due process "capture" in an "accurate and comprehensive way"? It stands for nothing whatever, except those freedoms and entitlements that this Court really likes. And the Equal Protection Clause, as employed today, identifies nothing except a difference in treatment that this Court ... Obergfell v. Hodges. If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I never joined an opinion for the Court that began: "The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity." I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.
     
14. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-01-13 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-01-13 Pub. Date: 2015-01-13
Image Number: 121968
Caption: Les Cathos Integristes. Contre le theatre. Charlie Hebdo. 100 coups de fouet, si vous n'etes pas morts de rire! So now the shock of the murders has turned to questioning Charlie Hebdo's satire. Some cartoonists and writers have described the cartoons as anti-Muslim, blasphemous, offensive and bigoted. The 2009 firing of a cartoonist who wrote and anti-Semitic column has also been mentioned ... First of all, I am not a big fan of bathroom humor. Secondly, and more seriously, it's a valid discussion to have about why the divisions between people are so deep and our political discourse have become toxic ... However: That is not what we should be talking about now. The only question we should be asking is: Do we condone threats or violence toward individuals because of what they say or draw, regardless of how offensive the words or images are? NO. Because what happens once we get beyond the easy images to condemn? What?? And who makes that decision? All people must have the right to express themselves without fear otherwise we risk losing all our freedoms.
     
15. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2006-12-23 bigotry 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2006-12-23 Pub. Date: 2006-12-23
Image Number: 26095
Caption: Tolerance for Dummies. Rep. Goode.
     
Result page:     (15 images)