I'd like to see
editorial cartoons
about ...



No need to add
editorial cartoons
to your keywords!

Advanced Search
Know the
image number?


Find editorial cartoons
for:

Books
Magazines
Newsletters
Presentations
Websites



Find Editorial Cartoons by: Cartoonist I
Advanced Search I Keyword(s)


The Contrary Editorial Cartoons

selected from 23 leading editorial cartoonists, including eight winners of the Pulitzer Prize.

These are available for you to license for books, magazines, newsletters, presentations and websites.
Roll-over each thumbnail and click on the image that appears to see links for licensing.
Questions? Please let us know.

View by Property Refine Search

Result page:     (11 images)


1. Joel Pett  Joel Pett's Editorial Cartoons 2017-03-23 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Joel Pett
Comic/Cartoon: Joel Pett's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2017-03-23 Pub. Date: 2017-03-23
Image Number: 156190
Caption: Whopper! Retraction? Double down! Proof to the contrary! Distraction? Noted! Media bash! Eye roll! "Walkback." Apology! Scoff! (Smirk). Unabashed new-whop! Rueful pattern lament!
     
2. Mike Luckovich  Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons 2015-09-09 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Mike Luckovich
Comic/Cartoon: Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-09-09 Pub. Date: 2015-09-09
Image Number: 132362
Caption: He's the president's top advisor, whatever he suggests, Obama does the opposite … Cheney.
     
3. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-29 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-29 Pub. Date: 2015-06-29
Image Number: 129201
Caption: Censored. Cite as: 576 U.S. - (2015). Scalia, J., dissenting. Every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification and Massachusetts' permitting of same-sex marriage in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a "fundamental right" overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in time since. They see what lesser legal minds - minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Olive Wendall Holmes, Hr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly - could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when is called for by their "reasoned judgment." These Justices know that limiting marriage to one mand and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution. The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic. It is one thing for separate concurring or dissenting opinions to contain extravagances, even silly extravagances, of thought and expression; it is something else for the official opinion of the Court to do so. Of course the opinion's show profundities are often profoundly incoherent. "The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy and spirituality. (Really? Who ever thought that intimacy and spirituality [whatever that means] were freedoms? And if intimacy is, one would think Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expanded by marriage. Ask the nearest hippie. Expression, sure enough, is a freedom, but anyone in a long-lasting marriage will attest that that happy state constricts, rather than expands, what one can prudently say.) Rights, we are told, can "rise ... from a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives define a liberty that remains urgent in our own era. (Huh? How can a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives [whatever that means] define [whatever that means] an urgent liberty [never mine], give birth to a right?) and we are told that, "[i]n any particular case," either the Equal Protection of Due Process Clause "may be thought to capture the essence of [a] right in a more accurate and comprehensive way, than the other, "even as the two Clauses may converge in the identification and definition of the right. (What say? What possible "essence" does substantive due process "capture" in an "accurate and comprehensive way"? It stands for nothing whatever, except those freedoms and entitlements that this Court really likes. And the Equal Protection Clause, as employed today, identifies nothing except a difference in treatment that this Court ... Obergfell v. Hodges. If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I never joined an opinion for the Court that began: "The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity." I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.
     
4. John Deering  John Deering's Editorial Cartoons 2015-02-08 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): John Deering
Comic/Cartoon: John Deering's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-02-08 Pub. Date: 2015-02-08
Image Number: 122922
Caption: The military helicopter in which I rode in Iraq was not shot down … contrary to the various accounts I've given since 2003 … As for the reporting I did from New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina which is now being re-examined, I can only say … Good night, America, and, courage!
     
5. Mike Luckovich  Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons 2013-05-05 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Mike Luckovich
Comic/Cartoon: Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2013-05-06 Pub. Date: 2013-05-05
Image Number: 96736
Caption: We're not responding because Obama WANTS us to respond … USA. Congressional Fire House.
     
6. Nick Anderson  Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons 2003-04-18 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Nick Anderson
Comic/Cartoon: Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2008-05-13 Pub. Date: 2003-04-18
Image Number: 4291
Caption: America, the Beautiful... Support President Bush and the Troops. Another Family for Peace. Support the War. Let Freedom Ring. Another Family Supporting Bush. No Blood for Oil! Support the Troops. Bring Them Home. Another Family for Impeachment. Support Bush. Support the War.
     
7. Mike Peters  Mike Peters' Editorial Cartoons 2006-08-20 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Mike Peters
Comic/Cartoon: Mike Peters' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2006-09-04 Pub. Date: 2006-08-20
Image Number: 14534
Caption: Press. We're losing the war … but be positive. We're positively losing the war.
     
8. Jen Sorensen  Jen Sorensen's Editorial Cartoons 2006-01-01 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Jen Sorensen
Comic/Cartoon: Jen Sorensen's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2006-01-01 Pub. Date: 2006-01-01
Image Number: 92675
Caption: Slowpoke. Drooly Julie's Culture Corner. Welcome to "The Lust Lab," where we talk nonstop about the horizontal bop! This week, due to a bizarre programming mistake, I'm filling in for rabid right-winger Laura Ingraham. First caller! ON AIR. Yeah. I just wanted to say that English should be the national language. Well, I prefer the universal language of love. I speak the humpinese dialect myself. Nothing achieves national unity like sweet porking! But- *sputter* (click) Next caller! Drooly, do you support our troops? Support the troops? I think of them constantly - their chiseled flesh bronzed by the desert sun, covered with a light dew of perspiration ... (pant!) That's not supporting - Hey, if all the troops had to look forward to was your sad prudish ass, they'd never get through the war! Next caller! Ma'am, it's sick perverts like yourself who are bringing this country down! On the contrary, I'm bringing this country up! I'm a red-blooded patriot into white-hot canoodling under blue American skies! I'm a uniter, not a divider-of start-spangled booty!
     
9. Nick Anderson  Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons 2003-01-23 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Nick Anderson
Comic/Cartoon: Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2003-06-16 Pub. Date: 2003-01-23
Image Number: 4121
Caption: Welcome to Iowa. I'm Al Sharpton…I'm here to speak for your disaffected young people, minorities, gays and lesbians… Cletus!
     
10. Signe Wilkinson  Signe Wilkinson's Editorial Cartoons 2002-12-03 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Signe Wilkinson
Comic/Cartoon: Signe Wilkinson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2002-12-09 Pub. Date: 2002-12-03
Image Number: 2188
Caption: Jihad, Inc. We're not fighting globalization. We love globalization.
     
11. Mike Peters  Mike Peters' Editorial Cartoons 2002-08-01 contrary 
Cartoonist(s): Mike Peters
Comic/Cartoon: Mike Peters' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2002-08-01 Pub. Date: 2002-08-01
Image Number: 1314
Caption: Saving My Butt. Saving My Butt. Saving My Butt. Saving My Butt. Corporate Responsibility Speech. I think we should change your background message.
     
Result page:     (11 images)