I'd like to see
editorial cartoons
about ...



No need to add
editorial cartoons
to your keywords!

Advanced Search
Know the
image number?


Find editorial cartoons
for:

Books
Magazines
Newsletters
Presentations
Websites



Find Editorial Cartoons by: Cartoonist I
Advanced Search I Keyword(s)


The Supreme Court Editorial Cartoons

selected from 23 leading editorial cartoonists, including eight winners of the Pulitzer Prize.

These are available for you to license for books, magazines, newsletters, presentations and websites.
Roll-over each thumbnail and click on the image that appears to see links for licensing.
Questions? Please let us know.

View by Property Refine Search View Related Subjects

Result page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next  (811 images)


221. John Deering  John Deering's Editorial Cartoons 2015-07-03 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): John Deering
Comic/Cartoon: John Deering's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-07-03 Pub. Date: 2015-07-03
Image Number: 129470
Caption: Eventually, they'll have to pour water on Scalia.
     
222. Gary Varvel  Gary Varvel's Editorial Cartoons 2015-07-03 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Gary Varvel
Comic/Cartoon: Gary Varvel's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-07-03 Pub. Date: 2015-07-03
Image Number: 129468
Caption: Shopping at the Legacy Store. SCOTUS approved. Gay marriage. Obamacare. SCOTUS approved. Iran deal. Wars end. Warning: ISIS included. Palestinian State. Assembly required. Record debt. Cuba.
     
223. Joel Pett  Joel Pett's Editorial Cartoons 2015-07-02 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Joel Pett
Comic/Cartoon: Joel Pett's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-07-02 Pub. Date: 2015-07-02
Image Number: 129231
Caption: Stoopid game!! Scalia. Judicial Temperament.
     
224. Nick Anderson  Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-30 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Nick Anderson
Comic/Cartoon: Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-30 Pub. Date: 2015-06-30
Image Number: 129200
Caption: In order to protect the sanctity of marriage … I want a divorce. TX Gov. Abbott. Officials can refuse gay marriage licenses. Rule of Law.
     
225. Clay Bennett  Clay Bennett's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-30 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Clay Bennett
Comic/Cartoon: Clay Bennett's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-30 Pub. Date: 2015-06-30
Image Number: 129215
Caption: Yes we won. Patients over politics. Don't take my care. ACA is here to stay! Love wins. Marriage equality. Fox News. 'But on the bright side, the court has just upheld executions and pollution.'
     
226. Chip Bok  Chip Bok's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-30 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Chip Bok
Comic/Cartoon: Chip Bok's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-30 Pub. Date: 2015-06-30
Image Number: 129203
Caption: Ouch! Thud. Exit. The chief justice doesn't believe the plain text reflects the architect's true intent.
     
227. John Deering  John Deering's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-30 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): John Deering
Comic/Cartoon: John Deering's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-30 Pub. Date: 2015-06-30
Image Number: 129205
Caption: Just Married.
     
228. Gary Varvel  Gary Varvel's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-30 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Gary Varvel
Comic/Cartoon: Gary Varvel's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-30 Pub. Date: 2015-06-30
Image Number: 129216
Caption: U.S. Constitution (2015 Revision). We the … Supreme … Court … make the … Laws.
     
229. Chip Bok  Chip Bok's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-29 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Chip Bok
Comic/Cartoon: Chip Bok's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-29 Pub. Date: 2015-06-29
Image Number: 129164
Caption: Now the Supreme Court says you gotta bake a gay wedding cake. States.
     
230. Jen Sorensen  Jen Sorensen's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-29 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Jen Sorensen
Comic/Cartoon: Jen Sorensen's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-29 Pub. Date: 2015-06-29
Image Number: 129207
Caption: The Right's Rights. Some people are outraged by recent Supreme Court rulings. (Man) + (Woman) only. I've been denied the right to deny the right to marry! League for Liberty to Limit Liberties. Now people are no longer free to be prohibited from buying health insurance! This will only lead to more businesses being forced to bake gay wedding cakes! My life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness depend on denying health insurance claims! The Founding Fathers would be appalled!
     
231. Ann Telnaes  Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-29 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Ann Telnaes
Comic/Cartoon: Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-29 Pub. Date: 2015-06-29
Image Number: 129201
Caption: Censored. Cite as: 576 U.S. - (2015). Scalia, J., dissenting. Every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification and Massachusetts' permitting of same-sex marriage in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a "fundamental right" overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in time since. They see what lesser legal minds - minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Olive Wendall Holmes, Hr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly - could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when is called for by their "reasoned judgment." These Justices know that limiting marriage to one mand and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution. The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic. It is one thing for separate concurring or dissenting opinions to contain extravagances, even silly extravagances, of thought and expression; it is something else for the official opinion of the Court to do so. Of course the opinion's show profundities are often profoundly incoherent. "The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy and spirituality. (Really? Who ever thought that intimacy and spirituality [whatever that means] were freedoms? And if intimacy is, one would think Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expanded by marriage. Ask the nearest hippie. Expression, sure enough, is a freedom, but anyone in a long-lasting marriage will attest that that happy state constricts, rather than expands, what one can prudently say.) Rights, we are told, can "rise ... from a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives define a liberty that remains urgent in our own era. (Huh? How can a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives [whatever that means] define [whatever that means] an urgent liberty [never mine], give birth to a right?) and we are told that, "[i]n any particular case," either the Equal Protection of Due Process Clause "may be thought to capture the essence of [a] right in a more accurate and comprehensive way, than the other, "even as the two Clauses may converge in the identification and definition of the right. (What say? What possible "essence" does substantive due process "capture" in an "accurate and comprehensive way"? It stands for nothing whatever, except those freedoms and entitlements that this Court really likes. And the Equal Protection Clause, as employed today, identifies nothing except a difference in treatment that this Court ... Obergfell v. Hodges. If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I never joined an opinion for the Court that began: "The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity." I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.
     
232. Signe Wilkinson  Signe Wilkinson's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-29 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Signe Wilkinson
Comic/Cartoon: Signe Wilkinson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-29 Pub. Date: 2015-06-29
Image Number: 129177
Caption: Obama Care.
     
233. Nick Anderson  Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-28 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Nick Anderson
Comic/Cartoon: Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-28 Pub. Date: 2015-06-28
Image Number: 129161
Caption: Marriage license … We the People.
     
234. Joel Pett  Joel Pett's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-28 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Joel Pett
Comic/Cartoon: Joel Pett's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-28 Pub. Date: 2015-06-28
Image Number: 129172
Caption: Til death do you part … ACA.
     
235. Clay Bennett  Clay Bennett's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-27 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Clay Bennett
Comic/Cartoon: Clay Bennett's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-27 Pub. Date: 2015-06-27
Image Number: 129166
Caption: Liberty. Justice. For all.
     
236. John Deering  John Deering's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-27 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): John Deering
Comic/Cartoon: John Deering's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-27 Pub. Date: 2015-06-27
Image Number: 129171
Caption: Affordable Care Act ruling. "Fortunately for Scalia, he's already got good heath care coverage."
     
237. Nick Anderson  Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-26 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Nick Anderson
Comic/Cartoon: Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-26 Pub. Date: 2015-06-26
Image Number: 128987
Caption: It ain't over yet! Obamacare.
     
238. Lisa Benson  Lisa Benson's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-26 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Lisa Benson
Comic/Cartoon: Lisa Benson's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-26 Pub. Date: 2015-06-26
Image Number: 128993
Caption: Woo-hooo!! Sigh. Yippee! Ugh! Woot! Woot! Whew! SCOTUS saves Obamacare!
     
239. Jeff Danziger  Jeff Danziger's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-26 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Jeff Danziger
Comic/Cartoon: Jeff Danziger's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-26 Pub. Date: 2015-06-26
Image Number: 129242
Caption: And now the Distinguished Jurist Antonin Scalia Interprets the Law. This is jiggery-plobbaly! It's foomaly-broggaly! It's rammily-dingdongery! Scrabb rabbily. But they don't know who they are dealing with! I have a plan! I'll hold my breath until I explode! C'mon Alito, hold your breat with me ... um ...
     
240. Mike Luckovich  Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons 2015-06-26 Supreme Court 
Cartoonist(s): Mike Luckovich
Comic/Cartoon: Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons
Viewable Date: 2015-06-26 Pub. Date: 2015-06-26
Image Number: 128996
Caption: It's part of our heritage. Repeal Obamacare.
     
Result page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next  (811 images)