|
181. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
John Deering |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
John Deering's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-30 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-30 |
| Image Number: |
129205 |
| Caption: |
Just Married. |
|
| |
|
|
|
182. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Gary Varvel |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Gary Varvel's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-30 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-30 |
| Image Number: |
129216 |
| Caption: |
U.S. Constitution (2015 Revision). We the … Supreme … Court … make the … Laws. |
|
| |
|
|
|
183. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Chip Bok |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Chip Bok's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-29 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-29 |
| Image Number: |
129164 |
| Caption: |
Now the Supreme Court says you gotta bake a gay wedding cake. States. |
|
| |
|
|
|
184. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Jen Sorensen |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Jen Sorensen's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-29 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-29 |
| Image Number: |
129207 |
| Caption: |
The Right's Rights. Some people are outraged by recent Supreme Court rulings. (Man) + (Woman) only. I've been denied the right to deny the right to marry! League for Liberty to Limit Liberties. Now people are no longer free to be prohibited from buying health insurance! This will only lead to more businesses being forced to bake gay wedding cakes! My life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness depend on denying health insurance claims! The Founding Fathers would be appalled! |
|
| |
|
|
|
185. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Ann Telnaes |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Ann Telnaes' Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-29 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-29 |
| Image Number: |
129201 |
| Caption: |
Censored. Cite as: 576 U.S. - (2015). Scalia, J., dissenting. Every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification and Massachusetts' permitting of same-sex marriage in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a "fundamental right" overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in time since. They see what lesser legal minds - minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Olive Wendall Holmes, Hr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly - could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when is called for by their "reasoned judgment." These Justices know that limiting marriage to one mand and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution. The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic. It is one thing for separate concurring or dissenting opinions to contain extravagances, even silly extravagances, of thought and expression; it is something else for the official opinion of the Court to do so. Of course the opinion's show profundities are often profoundly incoherent. "The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy and spirituality. (Really? Who ever thought that intimacy and spirituality [whatever that means] were freedoms? And if intimacy is, one would think Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expanded by marriage. Ask the nearest hippie. Expression, sure enough, is a freedom, but anyone in a long-lasting marriage will attest that that happy state constricts, rather than expands, what one can prudently say.) Rights, we are told, can "rise ... from a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives define a liberty that remains urgent in our own era. (Huh? How can a better informed understanding of how constitutional imperatives [whatever that means] define [whatever that means] an urgent liberty [never mine], give birth to a right?) and we are told that, "[i]n any particular case," either the Equal Protection of Due Process Clause "may be thought to capture the essence of [a] right in a more accurate and comprehensive way, than the other, "even as the two Clauses may converge in the identification and definition of the right. (What say? What possible "essence" does substantive due process "capture" in an "accurate and comprehensive way"? It stands for nothing whatever, except those freedoms and entitlements that this Court really likes. And the Equal Protection Clause, as employed today, identifies nothing except a difference in treatment that this Court ... Obergfell v. Hodges. If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I never joined an opinion for the Court that began: "The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity." I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. |
|
| |
|
|
|
186. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Signe Wilkinson |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Signe Wilkinson's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-29 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-29 |
| Image Number: |
129177 |
| Caption: |
Obama Care. |
|
| |
|
|
|
187. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Nick Anderson |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-28 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-28 |
| Image Number: |
129161 |
| Caption: |
Marriage license … We the People. |
|
| |
|
|
|
188. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Joel Pett |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Joel Pett's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-28 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-28 |
| Image Number: |
129172 |
| Caption: |
Til death do you part … ACA. |
|
| |
|
|
|
189. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Clay Bennett |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Clay Bennett's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-27 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-27 |
| Image Number: |
129166 |
| Caption: |
Liberty. Justice. For all. |
|
| |
|
|
|
190. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
John Deering |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
John Deering's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-27 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-27 |
| Image Number: |
129171 |
| Caption: |
Affordable Care Act ruling. "Fortunately for Scalia, he's already got good heath care coverage." |
|
| |
|
|
|
191. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Nick Anderson |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Nick Anderson's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-26 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-26 |
| Image Number: |
128987 |
| Caption: |
It ain't over yet! Obamacare. |
|
| |
|
|
|
192. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Lisa Benson |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Lisa Benson's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-26 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-26 |
| Image Number: |
128993 |
| Caption: |
Woo-hooo!! Sigh. Yippee! Ugh! Woot! Woot! Whew! SCOTUS saves Obamacare! |
|
| |
|
|
|
193. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Jeff Danziger |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Jeff Danziger's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-26 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-26 |
| Image Number: |
129242 |
| Caption: |
And now the Distinguished Jurist Antonin Scalia Interprets the Law. This is jiggery-plobbaly! It's foomaly-broggaly! It's rammily-dingdongery! Scrabb rabbily. But they don't know who they are dealing with! I have a plan! I'll hold my breath until I explode! C'mon Alito, hold your breat with me ... um ... |
|
| |
|
|
|
194. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Mike Luckovich |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-26 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-26 |
| Image Number: |
128996 |
| Caption: |
It's part of our heritage. Repeal Obamacare. |
|
| |
|
|
|
195. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Gustavo Rodriguez |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Garrincha's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-26 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-26 |
| Image Number: |
129169 |
| Caption: |
No caption. (Uncle Sam, wearing a rainbow hat, runs away from an angry Republican elephant). |
|
| |
|
|
|
196. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
John Deering |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
John Deering's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-25 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-25 |
| Image Number: |
128979 |
| Caption: |
Obamacare is a fiasco, and the G.O.P. is trying to come up with some measures … in case the U.S. Supreme Court should take away people's Obamacare subsidies … which would be a fiasco … |
|
| |
|
|
|
197. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Mike Peters |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Mike Peters' Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-25 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-25 |
| Image Number: |
128998 |
| Caption: |
You have a chronic case of Obamacare. |
|
| |
|
|
|
198. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Chip Bok |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Chip Bok's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-23 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-23 |
| Image Number: |
128974 |
| Caption: |
Nice little court you got here … Shame if anything was to happen to it. |
|
| |
|
|
|
199. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Mike Luckovich |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Mike Luckovich's Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-17 |
Pub. Date: |
2015-06-17 |
| Image Number: |
128524 |
| Caption: |
Trump inaugural. |
|
| |
|
|
|
200. |
 |
| Cartoonist(s): |
Mike Peters |
| Comic/Cartoon: |
Mike Peters' Editorial Cartoons |
| Viewable Date: |
2015-06-15 |
Pub. Date: |
2006-06-09 |
| Image Number: |
13938 |
| Caption: |
Bobby Comes Out of the Closet. Mom, dad … I think I may be an activist judge. |
|
| |
|
|
Reddit
MySpace
Twitter
Google Bookmarks
Linked In
Share on Facebook
